Search found 547 matches

by Drarakel
2012-02-15T17:22:37-07:00
Forum: Users
Topic: Image signature changes if saved to a file then read back
Replies: 10
Views: 17287

Re: Image signature changes if saved to a file then read bac

Ah, ok. So, it's the 'hash' signature. Did you try to specify a fixed TIFF output format (with the Rmagick equivalent of "-type" and "-depth")? I think, you should be able to get identical strings (at least in such a test script :)). convert signature_test.tif -black-threshold 78% -format "%#" -writ...
by Drarakel
2012-02-15T10:30:52-07:00
Forum: Users
Topic: Image signature changes if saved to a file then read back
Replies: 10
Views: 17287

Re: Image signature changes if saved to a file then read bac

I'm still not sure what you mean with "signatures" here. As long as no other Rmagick users show up, we can't know what Rmagick saves as " image .signature". You only wrote about such return lines so far: signature_test2.tif TIFF 104x16 104x16+0+0 8-bit Bilevel DirectClass 621B But that tells almost ...
by Drarakel
2012-02-15T07:21:47-07:00
Forum: Users
Topic: Image signature changes if saved to a file then read back
Replies: 10
Views: 17287

Re: Image signature changes if saved to a file then read bac

Some suggestions: Perhaps you should tell at the very start which programming language/API you're using. (Perl? Ruby? Something?) And what you do in those scripts. (Seems now that you were cropping the image in the first script. And black-/white-thresholding the image in the second script. In order ...
by Drarakel
2012-02-14T14:04:42-07:00
Forum: Bugs
Topic: EMF+ support on Windows
Replies: 30
Views: 49361

Re: EMF+ support on Windows

OK. I think I'll wait for the next IM release versions and if there are still problems with these files, I can make a new thread. (I don't use this file type much. But I have one WMF that ImageMagick can't read and most of the EMFs get a bit distorted with the old EMF reader - I think, mainly as IM ...
by Drarakel
2012-02-14T13:48:11-07:00
Forum: Bugs
Topic: Byte Order Problem
Replies: 24
Views: 39745

Re: Byte Order Problem

Thank you!
by Drarakel
2012-02-14T11:40:24-07:00
Forum: Bugs
Topic: Byte Order Problem
Replies: 24
Views: 39745

Re: Byte Order Problem

Exactly - your output is completely correct, Fred. So your version of libtiff is higher than mine and appears to be a beta. Yeah, it's higher. But as I said - the change of the output (in Windows) came between v6.7.3-6 and v6.7.3-7, and both versions appear to have the same libtiff. I don't understa...
by Drarakel
2012-02-14T10:00:04-07:00
Forum: Bugs
Topic: EMF+ support on Windows
Replies: 30
Views: 49361

Re: EMF+ support on Windows

Also, I believe the emfplus tools works on all EMF formats, so it could replace the legecy delegate. That would be great! I had some problems with EMF and also WMF files in ImageMagick, and usually used the Windows Picture Viewer to decode these files. (I don't know if these are 'normal' EMF files,...
by Drarakel
2012-02-14T07:18:51-07:00
Forum: Bugs
Topic: Byte Order Problem
Replies: 24
Views: 39745

Re: Byte Order Problem

Strange. With IM v6.7.5-6 Q16 Win32, the "tiff:endian" output in "identify -verbose" is still not there. Which libtiff version are you using, Fred? Maybe it has something to do with the different libtiff versions in the Windows binaries. (Though, in both v6.7.3-6 AND v6.7.3-7, libtiff is reported he...
by Drarakel
2012-02-14T06:31:38-07:00
Forum: Users
Topic: Need proper -resize option
Replies: 3
Views: 8262

Re: Need proper -resize option

Regarding the Windows command line problems: There are problems with % and ^ signs not only in cmd.exe and .bat files but in process creating and starting with parameters in Delphi - there are not common rules unambigous. Some special characters (especially "^", ">", "<", also line breaks, etc.) nee...
by Drarakel
2012-02-13T14:27:59-07:00
Forum: Bugs
Topic: Byte Order Problem
Replies: 24
Views: 39745

Re: Byte Order Problem

I know that thread. :wink: But that's a completely different problem (restricted to JPG in TIFF).
by Drarakel
2012-02-13T13:11:32-07:00
Forum: Bugs
Topic: Byte Order Problem
Replies: 24
Views: 39745

Re: Byte Order Problem

So, it was added a few hours ago?
I can't test it, as there is no 6.7.5.6 Windows binary at the moment, I think. I'll wait.
Thanks!
by Drarakel
2012-02-13T12:51:01-07:00
Forum: Bugs
Topic: resizing tiff cmyk files
Replies: 18
Views: 32168

Re: resizing tiff cmyk files

Did you use Mac Preview, Fred? With IM 6.7.5-5 Q16 on Windows XP, it doesn't work. It's a problem of reading CMYK JPG in TIFF. I was curious and searched the version where it changed. The bug came with v6.6.4-4, it seems. "identify -verbose" with e.g. test.tif shows: Type: ColorSeparation Base type:...
by Drarakel
2012-02-13T11:37:54-07:00
Forum: Bugs
Topic: Byte Order Problem
Replies: 24
Views: 39745

Re: Byte Order Problem

The thread was not about false settings. (The chatter in between was there as Anthony asked about the current TIFF behaviour - for a new IM Examples summary, I presume.) The OP asked whether it's possible that "identify -verbose" shows the byte order of a TIFF file. Up to version 6.7.3-6, the byte o...
by Drarakel
2012-02-13T08:22:14-07:00
Forum: Bugs
Topic: Byte Order Problem
Replies: 24
Views: 39745

Re: Byte Order Problem

However, most of the above is off-topic. :) The problem of the OP was, that "tiff:endian" (the TIFF byte order) can't get output anymore: With v6.7.3-6, this was still possible: convert -define tiff:endian=msb rose: -endian lsb tif:- | identify -verbose tif:- Endianess: LSB ... tiff:endian: msb It s...
by Drarakel
2012-02-13T08:18:08-07:00
Forum: Bugs
Topic: Byte Order Problem
Replies: 24
Views: 39745

Re: Byte Order Problem

Try ImageMagick-6.7.5-4 and let us know if you continue to have problems with tiff:fill-order. Works now. Thanks again. "-define tiff:fill-order" does now the same as "-endian" (for TIFF). And the define takes precedence over "-endian", if both options are specified. Another small difference to the...