Search found 7 matches
- 2019-06-29T02:56:27-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: text_decoration (underline, line_through) is too thin than the font default from the other render result
- Replies: 4
- Views: 8374
Re: text_decoration (underline, line_through) is too thin than the font default from the other render result
I just sent a PR at https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/pull/1619
- 2019-06-28T07:14:05-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: text_decoration (underline, line_through) is too thin than the font default from the other render result
- Replies: 4
- Views: 8374
Re: text_decoration (underline, line_through) is too thin than the font default from the other render result
There seems still an issue in annotating process (line through position is not correct accurately)
I will fix that issue as well, and then you can check the source code from PR in GitHub
I will fix that issue as well, and then you can check the source code from PR in GitHub
- 2019-06-28T07:12:32-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: text_decoration (underline, line_through) is too thin than the font default from the other render result
- Replies: 4
- Views: 8374
Re: text_decoration (underline, line_through) is too thin than the font default from the other render result
Hmmm, There seems no one is interested in this issue... So I tried to fix this issue by my self by changing the source file in MagickCore And below is the result (this case I used NotoSerifCJK JP) Underline https://i.ibb.co/rbqy2Lm/screenshot-2019-06-28-10-54-40.png LineThrough https://i.ibb.co/1vLf...
- 2019-06-24T02:54:54-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: text_decoration (underline, line_through) is too thin than the font default from the other render result
- Replies: 4
- Views: 8374
text_decoration (underline, line_through) is too thin than the font default from the other render result
Hello there When I use ImageMagick with decorate option The result seems wrong when I compare Photoshop or MS Word result The problem is that the line width of underline or throughline is too thin than which I expected Even ImageMagick uses depending on the OTF font information The line is extremely...
- 2019-06-20T23:37:28-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: Noto Sans CJK OTF font padding is quite different by comparing to Photoshop result
- Replies: 4
- Views: 6531
Re: Noto Sans CJK OTF font padding is quite different by comparing to Photoshop result
@fmw42 Thank you for showing the result on your environment But Your result is same as our result, The problem is ImageMagick uses a large of padding among the OTF There is a lot of looks different between the other rendering solution when we use OTF font such as NotoSans CJK JP You can check the pa...
- 2019-06-19T23:43:04-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: Noto Sans CJK OTF font padding is quite different by comparing to Photoshop result
- Replies: 4
- Views: 6531
Re: Noto Sans CJK OTF font padding is quite different by comparing to Photoshop result
@fmw42 Oh.. I see thank you for informing it And I tested also with the magick command today But the result seems no different https://i.ibb.co/PjxzBFK/screenshot-2019-06-20-3-40-39.png Following is the command which i used magick -background white -fill black -pointsize 64 -font /Users/user/Downloa...
- 2019-06-18T02:26:34-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: Noto Sans CJK OTF font padding is quite different by comparing to Photoshop result
- Replies: 4
- Views: 6531
Noto Sans CJK OTF font padding is quite different by comparing to Photoshop result
Hello There! I'm using ImageMagick7 to render the text with Noto Sans CJK JP font However, There seems an issue when We render Noto Sans font ( https://www.google.com/get/noto/#sans-jpan ) We have tried with covert command to check the sample of the result But the result has quite large padding (or ...