Search found 245 matches

by rmagick
2007-01-11T20:14:15-07:00
Forum: Bugs
Topic: Bug in fill drawing primitive in 6.3.1
Replies: 2
Views: 14505

You're welcome. Thanks for the quick response!
by rmagick
2007-01-11T17:29:05-07:00
Forum: Bugs
Topic: Bug in fill drawing primitive in 6.3.1
Replies: 2
Views: 14505

Bug in fill drawing primitive in 6.3.1

I'm running ImageMagick 6.3.1 01/06/07 Q16. Using the following command, Version 6.3.1 produces an incorrect image. Version 6.2.9 produces the expected result. convert -size 300x300 rvg_pattern.mvg test.gif Version 6.3.1 produces this image: http://home.nc.rr.com/foxhunter/test-6.3.1.gif . Version 6...
by rmagick
2007-01-06T20:03:48-07:00
Forum: Users
Topic: Really Basic Question By NewUser
Replies: 3
Views: 10176

A leading dash ("-") indicates an option. Filenames don't need a leading dash. Just use

Code: Select all

convert image.jpg image.png
by rmagick
2007-01-06T16:38:39-07:00
Forum: Users
Topic: ImageMagick as a engine for image editor?
Replies: 1
Views: 7131

psitsNOT is a web-based image editor built with Ruby On Rails and RMagick.

http://psitsnot.alevans.com/login/index
by rmagick
2007-01-03T16:06:55-07:00
Forum: Users
Topic: annotate with RTL languages
Replies: 2
Views: 9032

annotate with RTL languages

Does ImageMagick support annotation with RTL languages such as Hebrew? If so, can you tell me how to do it?
by rmagick
2007-01-02T18:33:30-07:00
Forum: Users
Topic: QuantizeImage() is slow!
Replies: 1
Views: 6598

If you're using the Q16 build of ImageMagick and you don't specifically need 16-bits-per-channel pixels, use the Q8 build instead. It's about 2x as fast. You can determine which version of ImageMagick you're using by running

Code: Select all

convert -version
by rmagick
2006-12-29T18:31:57-07:00
Forum: Users
Topic: Corrupt TIFF images
Replies: 2
Views: 9218

Thanks for your quick response!
by rmagick
2006-12-29T08:21:47-07:00
Forum: Users
Topic: Corrupt TIFF images
Replies: 2
Views: 9218

Corrupt TIFF images

An RMagick user is having trouble with corrupted TIFF images. He is processing about 16,000 images. Some are 2048x3072, the rest are 1024x1536. About 50 of the output images are corrupt. Each time he repeats the processing a different set of output images are corrupted. He is not able to predict whi...
by rmagick
2006-12-22T11:25:12-07:00
Forum: Users
Topic: ./configure trouble
Replies: 0
Views: 6198

Support for GIF is built in to ImageMagick.
by rmagick
2006-12-19T11:15:43-07:00
Forum: Users
Topic: Converting TIF image twice produces different image files
Replies: 6
Views: 19490

Thanks! I knew it was something peculiar to the image.
by rmagick
2006-12-19T09:33:38-07:00
Forum: Users
Topic: Converting TIF image twice produces different image files
Replies: 6
Views: 19490

Were you able to get to the image I referred to in the previous post?
by rmagick
2006-12-17T07:55:02-07:00
Forum: Users
Topic: Converting TIF image twice produces different image files
Replies: 6
Views: 19490

Test image

Thanks for your help! Here's the input image.

http://rubyforge.org/tracker/download.p ... /input.tif
by rmagick
2006-12-16T14:38:29-07:00
Forum: Users
Topic: Converting TIF image twice produces different image files
Replies: 6
Views: 19490

Converting TIF image twice produces different image files

Below is a script that takes an input TIFF image and does a "no-op" conversion to TIFF. It then takes the output image and performs the same conversion. It does this 10 times. Each output image file is slightly different, having a different signature, different number of colors, different ...
by rmagick
2006-12-14T17:05:34-07:00
Forum: Users
Topic: On the fly conversion?
Replies: 0
Views: 5766

I don't know PHP but I'm guessing that there's a way to capture stdout from the command into a variable. If so, you can just specify - as the output filename. For example,

convert logo: gif:-
by rmagick
2006-12-11T20:20:02-07:00
Forum: Users
Topic: Bordery of Photo Soften / "Fade out"
Replies: 2
Views: 9846

I think this script will do what you want. The tricky part is figuring out the dimensions of the opaque part. For simplicity it always makes the opaque part be 75% of the image's width and height. Of course you can change the "75 / 100" arithmetic to whatever fraction you want. Save this c...