IM seems really usefull :)

Post here to shower the ImageMagick developers with praise or discuss how you could have done a better job if you developed ImageMagick. Or talk about how Photoshop is better than ImageMagick. Even complain about how no one answered your postings in the Users forum. Venting and musings welcomed here.
Post Reply
Batsman
Posts: 6
Joined: 2011-03-25T14:16:53-07:00
Authentication code: 8675308

IM seems really usefull :)

Post by Batsman »

Yeah,

I just discovered the possibilities of IM, overwhelming I must say. Diving into a CLI app takes some time but it seems more than worth it :)
I think I'll be back on the forum to ask a few question but I'll try to figure it out myself first.

Anyway, thanks to all developers for this amazing app !
User avatar
fmw42
Posts: 25562
Joined: 2007-07-02T17:14:51-07:00
Authentication code: 1152
Location: Sunnyvale, California, USA

Re: IM seems really usefull :)

Post by fmw42 »

User avatar
anthony
Posts: 8883
Joined: 2004-05-31T19:27:03-07:00
Authentication code: 8675308
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: IM seems really usefull :)

Post by anthony »

I would also add
http://www.imagemagick.org/Usage/basics/

as one of the first starting points.
Anthony Thyssen -- Webmaster for ImageMagick Example Pages
https://imagemagick.org/Usage/
Batsman
Posts: 6
Joined: 2011-03-25T14:16:53-07:00
Authentication code: 8675308

Re: IM seems really usefull :)

Post by Batsman »

Thanks for the links, I've been going through some of those already.
But I turned to IM for two specific batch tasks. I found a way to accomplish one of those, the second is still a mistery. I think I'm posting the challenge and hope someone can point me in the right direction.

Thnx.
Post Reply