Search found 10963 matches

by magick
2019-05-23T18:22:38-07:00
Forum: Bugs
Topic: possible bug IM 7.0.8.46 -alpha deactivate/activate
Replies: 1
Views: 47

Re: possible bug IM 7.0.8.46 -alpha deactivate/activate

Grab the latest beta (building now). This command works for both IMv6 and IMv7: convert text.png -alpha deactivate -blur 0x6 -shade 135x5 -normalize +level 30% -alpha activate shaded7.png There is a slight difference in shading. You can change the intensity to Rec609 and the results should match.
by magick
2019-05-21T18:16:29-07:00
Forum: Bugs
Topic: Conversion of SVG image to PNG with text that includes an & adds extra space around ampersand
Replies: 6
Views: 262

Re: Conversion of SVG image to PNG with text that includes an & adds extra space around ampersand

@hairykid shows the filename as msvg:... which suggests the renderer is MSVG, the internal ImageMagick SVG renderer.
by magick
2019-05-21T15:32:47-07:00
Forum: Bugs
Topic: Conversion of SVG image to PNG with text that includes an & adds extra space around ampersand
Replies: 6
Views: 262

Re: Conversion of SVG image to PNG with text that includes an & adds extra space around ampersand

We're not getting extra space in the ampersand with ImageMagick 7.0.8-46, the current release. Can you try with -46 and see if the problem persists for you?
by magick
2019-05-21T15:22:17-07:00
Forum: Users
Topic: Improper image header. ReadPSDImage/2237
Replies: 3
Views: 102

Re: Improper image header. ReadPSDImage/2237

Thanks for the problem report. We can reproduce it and will have a patch to fix it in GIT master branch @ https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick later today. The patch will be available in the beta releases of ImageMagick @ https://www.imagemagick.org/download/beta/ by sometime tomorrow.
by magick
2019-05-21T15:16:10-07:00
Forum: Bugs
Topic: Using Screen & Multiple with Inline images stopped working again.
Replies: 8
Views: 2252

Re: Using Screen & Multiple with Inline images stopped working again.

Post a command and a link to any images we'll need to download to reproduce the problem. Hopefully we will be able to reproduce the problem. If so, we'll have a fix within a day or two.
by magick
2019-05-21T04:55:39-07:00
Forum: Developers
Topic: Implementing a coder for the TIM2 format
Replies: 4
Views: 336

Re: Implementing a coder for the TIM2 format

We'll get to the TIM2 pull request. As you might imagine, ImageMagick is a huge project and there are hundreds of workstreams pending. We also need to check to ensure there are no license/patent issues associated with TIM2.
by magick
2019-05-19T09:35:52-07:00
Forum: Users
Topic: Sorry, can not handle images with 32-bit samples
Replies: 5
Views: 227

Re: Sorry, can not handle images with 32-bit samples

Thanks for the problem report. We can reproduce it and will have a patch to fix it in GIT master branch @ https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick later today. The patch will be available in the beta releases of ImageMagick @ https://www.imagemagick.org/download/beta/ by sometime tomorrow.
by magick
2019-05-18T12:20:00-07:00
Forum: Fred's Scripts
Topic: Fred scripts are NOT working on 64 bit Windows 10
Replies: 9
Views: 297

Re: Fred scripts are NOT working on 64 bit Windows 10

Under Windows 10, you can enable developers mode and install BASH. Here BASH is an instance of Ubuntu and is fully supported by Microsoft. From the BASH terminal windows, Fred's scripts will work flawlessly. Just install ImageMagick first with this command:

Code: Select all

apt install imagemagick
by magick
2019-05-18T08:37:16-07:00
Forum: Bugs
Topic: Single line rectangles not working
Replies: 1
Views: 122

Re: Single line rectangles not working

Thanks for the problem report. We can reproduce it and will have a patch to fix it in GIT master branch @ https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick later today. The patch will be available in the beta releases of ImageMagick @ https://www.imagemagick.org/download/beta/ by sometime tomorrow.
by magick
2019-05-18T06:05:35-07:00
Forum: Bugs
Topic: "-morphology thicken" in v7
Replies: 2
Views: 164

Re: "-morphology thicken" in v7

Thanks for the problem report. We can reproduce it and will have a patch to fix it in GIT master branch @ https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick later today. The patch will be available in the beta releases of ImageMagick @ https://www.imagemagick.org/download/beta/ by sometime tomorrow.
by magick
2019-05-16T08:22:45-07:00
Forum: Bugs
Topic: Config Error for 7.0.8.45
Replies: 5
Views: 349

Re: Config Error for 7.0.8.45

We recently updated to the latest autoconf/automake configuration files and something broke. The culprit is likely in automake. Until there is patch try this command to build ImageMagick:

Code: Select all

./configure MKDIR_P="/bin/mkdir -p" --disable-dependency-tracking
by magick
2019-05-13T17:46:11-07:00
Forum: Bugs
Topic: Make Error for IM 6.9.10.45 and 7.0.8.45
Replies: 6
Views: 410

Re: Make Error for IM 6.9.10.45 and 7.0.8.45

Try .46 Beta, building now. Does that resolve the problem?
by magick
2019-05-13T05:09:33-07:00
Forum: PerlMagick
Topic: How do modules like Image:Magick work?
Replies: 1
Views: 261

Re: How do modules like Image:Magick work?

The simplest path forward is to build PerlMagick when you build/install ImageMagick. Just add --with-perl on your configure command-line. It will install a compatible PerlMagick along with the ImageMagick libraries/utilities. If you build PerlMagick separately, that should be OK too. ImageMagick has...
by magick
2019-05-13T04:23:47-07:00
Forum: Users
Topic: Turning performance of signature hashing
Replies: 16
Views: 1050

Re: Turning performance of signature hashing

We get the same signature for Q8, Q16, and Q16HDRI for your image:

Code: Select all

signature: 91460fb1d8dd878bbfb0ea82281c46aa7493b82bf11ac5ca47120adb403d8728
by magick
2019-05-12T17:04:52-07:00
Forum: Users
Topic: Turning performance of signature hashing
Replies: 16
Views: 1050

Re: Turning performance of signature hashing

Post a link to your image. We need to download it and reproduce the problem. We have unit tests against Q8, Q16, and Q16HDRI and they all return the same image signature for each image we tested.