Legacy ImageMagick Discussions Archive

Thanks for the tip!

As the author himself cared enough to answer my thread I will give it another go.

I must have done something wrong with the ImageMagick bmp to png conversion.

This time I will use the best version like this

wget http://www.imagemagick.org/download/ImageMagick.tar.gz
tar xzf ...

If you want the very smallest png possible, you might use pngcrush after IM: http://pmt.sourceforge.net/pngcrush/

Thanks snibgo.

After your post I read around that it is very popular and probably the first of its kind.

I compiled the source version with "make" without flags, put pngcrush inside ...

This is not my area of expertise so I hope you will excuse my asking the following "stupid" questions:

First of all I failed to install ImageMagick-6.8.8-9.x86_64.rpm

I did as instructed on imagemagick.org
rpm -Uvh http://www.imagemagick.org/download/linux/CentOS/x86_64/ImageMagick-6.8.8-9.x86_64 ...

I'm not seeing the problem with IM-6.8.8-9 Q16

convert sFGCDET.png -transparent '#FC00FC' sfg.png
and
convert sFGCDET.png -transparent '#FC00FC' png8:sfg8.png
both give me a PNG8. The only difference is that the first contains a bKGD chunk
while the other does not.

Hello Glen,

Thanks for ...

Hello everyone!

I try to explain my problem as best I can.

I have many bmp (about a game) such as this one http://imgur.com/sFGCDET

As you can see these pictures have the most unlikely possible colour as background colour (#FC00FC) because my objective is to make #FC00FC transparent.

My second ...

Does it cause segmentation faults as well?

I believe this is what is happening to me. Need to upgrade...