Search found 11064 matches
- 2019-08-02T16:04:58-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Documentation sources and command online playground initiative
- Replies: 3
- Views: 62750
Re: Documentation sources and command online playground initiative
The authoritative website source is @ https://github.com/ImageMagick/Website. We have a script that generates the ImageMagick website @ https://imagemagick.org from the authoritative website source. https://www.imagemagick.org/Usage is a contributed website that we do not maintain. Anthony does, a f...
- 2019-08-01T10:54:50-07:00
- Forum: MagickStudio
- Topic: VIEW Tab Not Working Exception 445: unable to open
- Replies: 2
- Views: 59702
Re: VIEW Tab Not Working Exception 445: unable to open
Unfortunately we cannot reproduce the problem you reported. What is site you're visiting? Does this happen with all images or a specific image? If its a specific image, post a link to the image so we can download it and attempt to reproduce the exception you received.
- 2019-07-29T03:55:58-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: ImageMagick Vulnerability Handled?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 58426
Re: ImageMagick Vulnerability Handled?
We receive vulnerability reports from the Bugs forum, Git issues, and OSS-fuzz which continuously tries to trigger potential vulnerabilities and we actively repair any vulnerabilities we confirm. In addition, we release often to ensure the user community has access to the latest security patches. Fi...
- 2019-07-26T04:17:48-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Formalizing ModulusAdd and ModulusSubtract
- Replies: 4
- Views: 65794
Re: Formalizing ModulusAdd and ModulusSubtract
We will review/confirm/correct the ModulusAdd computation within a few days. Thanks for your analysis.
- 2019-07-25T10:46:45-07:00
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: Crop with virtual canvas wrong offset when negative
- Replies: 6
- Views: 71153
Re: Crop with virtual canvas wrong offset when negative
Thanks for the problem report. We can reproduce it and will have a patch to fix it in GIT master branch @ https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick later today. The patch will be available in the beta releases of ImageMagick @ http://www.imagemagick.org/download/beta/ by sometime tomorrow.
- 2019-07-24T03:19:40-07:00
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: Possible bug IM 7.0.8.54 -alpha shape
- Replies: 5
- Views: 10859
Re: Possible bug IM 7.0.8.54 -alpha shape
Thanks for the problem report. We can reproduce it and will have a patch to fix it in GIT master branch @ https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick later today. The patch will be available in the beta releases of ImageMagick @ http://www.imagemagick.org/download/beta/ by sometime tomorrow.
- 2019-07-23T04:08:37-07:00
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: Possible bug IM 7.0.8.54 -alpha shape
- Replies: 5
- Views: 10859
Re: Possible bug IM 7.0.8.54 -alpha shape
Your commands work for us, we get identical results for IMv6 & IMv7. Turn off OpenCL and try again. Did that work? If so it could be -blur giving incorrect results on your GPU.
- 2019-07-22T04:25:18-07:00
- Forum: Developers
- Topic: Formalizing ModulusAdd and ModulusSubtract
- Replies: 4
- Views: 65794
Re: Formalizing ModulusAdd and ModulusSubtract
Let's go to the authoritative source, IMv7: Alpha: alpha=RoundToUnity(Sa+Da-Sa*Da); Gray: case ModulusAddCompositeOp: { pixel=Sc+Dc; while (pixel > QuantumRange) pixel-=QuantumRange; while (pixel < 0.0) pixel+=QuantumRange; pixel=(Sa*Da*pixel+Sa*Sc*(1.0-Da)+Da*Dc*(1.0-Sa)); break; } case ModulusSubt...
- 2019-07-20T06:22:34-07:00
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: Possible bug IM 7.0.8.54 -alpha shape
- Replies: 5
- Views: 10859
Re: Possible bug IM 7.0.8.54 -alpha shape
Thanks for the problem report. We can reproduce it and will have a patch to fix it in GIT master branch @ https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick later today. The patch will be available in the beta releases of ImageMagick @ http://www.imagemagick.org/download/beta/ by sometime tomorrow.
- 2019-07-17T13:45:27-07:00
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: thinning skeleton
- Replies: 1
- Views: 6635
Re: thinning skeleton
Unfortunately we cannot reproduce the problem. We're using ImageMagick 7.0.8-54, the current release, and we compare the result to that of 7.0.7-28 and we get a zero distortion: $ magick example.png -negate -morphology Thinning:-1 Skeleton result.png $compare -metric rmse result.png exampth7.png nul...
- 2019-07-16T04:21:00-07:00
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: Possible bug IM 6.9.10.53 fx expression %[fx:e]
- Replies: 4
- Views: 8756
Re: Possible bug IM 6.9.10.53 fx expression %[fx:e]
Thanks for the problem report. We can reproduce it and will have a patch to fix it in GIT master branch @ https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick later today. The patch will be available in the beta releases of ImageMagick @ http://www.imagemagick.org/download/beta/ by sometime tomorrow.
- 2019-07-14T12:38:30-07:00
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: Problem with FX expression %[fx:n]
- Replies: 2
- Views: 8184
Re: Problem with FX expression %[fx:n]
ImageMagick is behaving properly. Querying properties requires an image container. In some cases, the user demands a property even if an image is not available so one is automagically created. For example, you might want to perform a FX calculation before an image is read: magick -print "%[fx:....
- 2019-07-11T04:53:33-07:00
- Forum: Users
- Topic: Unable to read multipage TIFF file past page 6459
- Replies: 2
- Views: 7051
Re: Unable to read multipage TIFF file past page 6459
Try this command:
Code: Select all
magick -limit memory 2GB -limit map 4GB -quiet "input.tiff[6550-7000]" "tiff64:output%d".tiff
- 2019-07-10T09:54:18-07:00
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: Compare does not respect precision
- Replies: 1
- Views: 7151
Re: Compare does not respect precision
Thanks for the problem report. We can reproduce it and will have a patch to fix it in GIT master branch @ https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick later today. The patch will be available in the beta releases of ImageMagick @ http://www.imagemagick.org/download/beta/ by sometime tomorrow.
- 2019-07-05T09:48:19-07:00
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: Possible bug IM 6: Inconsistency in getting mean of alpha data?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 7587
Re: Possible bug IM 6: Inconsistency in getting mean of alpha data?
IMv6 has deficiencies that we addressed in IMv7. This is one of them. We cannot fix the problem you posted.